Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Democracy 2.0

The 2016 primaries have literally left me speechless and it’s easy to say that Donald Trump’s presidential campaign is one for the books.  If we can barely come to terms with Trump potentially becoming president, could you imagine the rumors about Kanye West’s run in 2020?

I’ve had a chance to watch the debates and rallies leading up to the biggest day of the primaries, Super Tuesday. 13 states will hold their elections tomorrow and Trump seems to be in control. How? The media is eating out of the palm of Trump’s hands with all the publicity his campaign has been getting. An analyst referred to Trump as a trailblazer for politics even though he has no political background. I feel like Trump’s absurd tactic and comments are meant to distract us from the real issues. If you listened to his speeches Trump just bashes other candidates, countries or people to please the crowd and then briefly goes over important issues like foreign policy or health care.

Many of my friends have expressed their opinion on social media about Trump and how this ridiculous joke has the potential to become a reality within months. 





I come across a post about Trump on my Facebook and Twitter feeds daily and with these videos or memes being constantly viewed and shared only makes Trump’s stock go up. The fact that we as a society devote some much effort to criticize or critique Trump over all the other candidates is the attention Trump has lived for his whole life, especially now on the biggest stage of them all. The funny thing is Trump degraded the media, in particular the New York Times, in his rally in Texas Friday morning. Trump wants to change laws so that the media can’t say negative things about him… ironic since they are a major factor in his success.  Also, on Friday before the announcement of the Chris Christie endorsement, Marco Rubio mocked Trump’s tweets and tried to “fight fire with fire”. I just thought to myself, “Is this what our country has come too? Who can talk sh*t the best?” I’ve gained the mindset of voting for the candidate that is going to the least amount of damage to our country for the next four years, but yet I am still dumbfounded.

Any individual who thinks they are qualified to be the most powerful person in the world should be required to have political background of some sort. I think that every candidates should hold office of an applicable political position for at least one full term before even be eligible to run for president. To me experience is essential to everything in life. You don’t get hire to become a CEO of a company with no job experience, so why are we letting a power thirsty businessman or a mediocre rapper even be in the conversation of politics let alone being the leader of the free world? There need to be stricter requirements for this office because it is so important to our nation’s future. I’ve come to idea that we have lost sight of good leaders who want the best for the American people and instead accept those politicians who say what we want to hear to get elected and then pursue their own self-interests. Was Christie’s endorsement in spite of Hilary Clinton or just to get a seat in the White House? Politics are complex and apart of the foundation of this country was built on, therefore we can’t just let anyone be president. We should have higher standards for a position of such powerful representation of the citizen of the United States.

1 comment:

  1. Shelby,
    I really enjoyed the opening statement in your final paragraph talking about experience. You mention that experience is the most important qualification needed to hold presidential office. I completely agree with your premise of having to serve at least one term in political office. I do want to ask you what level or rank of office needed to serve in. Does one term as an elect4d student body president make qualify as political service, or does it need to be in legislation office?
    In regard to your statement about who can be the best at trash talking, I felt the same way watching the republican debates. I felt as if it was more of a roast of our current president, rather than a discussion about political affairs. I hope that we will all be able to look back with a sigh of relief after this is all settled, and we have at least some competence in politics.

    ReplyDelete